
In his regular BBC Sport column on football tactics, Robbie Savage looks at
Chelsea's fightback to beat Southampton.
Saints came to Stamford Bridge with the best defensive
record in the Premier League, having conceded only seven goals in their
first 12 games.
They were gifted the lead after 13 seconds by Michael
Essien's mistake, but Jay Rodriguez's goal was their only shot on target
in the 90 minutes and the game became a test of Southampton's defensive
solidity.
Mauricio Pochettino's side dealt well with Chelsea in
the first half, but Blues boss Jose Mourinho changed from a 4-2-3-1 to a
4-4-2 formation at half-time, opting for a more direct style, and it
worked.
Saints go for another shut-out
When they defended their lead in the first half, we saw
why Southampton have got such a fantastic defensive record this season.
Southampton left-back Luke Shaw tussles for the ball with Chelsea striker Fernando Torres
Their back four and the two defensive midfielders
Morgan Schneiderlin and Victor Wanyama work hard and are well drilled
and, when they have time to get back into their shape, they are very
difficult to break down.
Chelsea were getting crowded out in midfield and there
was little space for their three flair players - Oscar, Eden Hazard and
Juan Mata - to operate in.
The Blues only really threatened when they attacked
down the wings but Saints looked pretty comfortable and probably could
have done more damage themselves when they counter-attacked.
Chelsea change things round
Mourinho clearly worked out that he needed to put more
pressure on the Southampton defence, and fast - before they could
regroup after losing possession.
How he did that was to bring on Demba Ba for Michael Essien at half-time and switch to a 4-4-2.
Mourinho gave up trying to pass round Southampton's
well-organised banks of players and decided to go over them instead.
Having two men up front meant that, straight away, Saints centre-backs
were far busier.
Chelsea players' average positions against Southampton
|
First half (playing 4-2-3-1)
|
Second half (playing 4-4-2)
|
Key
|
9: Fernando Torres
|
8: Frank Lampard
|
10: Juan Mata
|
17: Eden Hazard
|
11: Oscar
|
19: Demba Ba
|
Chelsea played a much more direct style in the second half, to get the ball up to Ba and Fernando Torres quicker.
That meant they played far fewer passes than normal,
and they were less precise - they managed only 163 in the second half
compared to 204 before the break and their total of 367 was their lowest
of the season at Stamford Bridge, as was their passing accuracy of 73%,
compared with their average before kick-off of 84%.
They also had far less possession (50.96%) than in
previous home games (an average of 60.4% this season) but Mourinho
realised that keeping the ball against Southampton does not really help -
if you pass it around in midfield, it just gives them time to regroup
at the back.
Putting Ba on also helped when Chelsea lost possession, which happened a lot.
Saints like to build from the back but the Blues had
another striker closing down their defenders and denying them time on
the ball.
Chelsea's passing and possession in the Premier League this season
|
|
Opposition
|
Result
|
Possession %
|
Passes
|
Passing accuracy %
|
Source: Opta
|
Hull (h)
|
W 2-0
|
51.39%
|
551
|
85.66%
|
Aston Villa (h)
|
W 2-1
|
69.18%
|
677
|
87.74%
|
Man Utd (a)
|
D 0-0
|
44.79%
|
448
|
81.92%
|
Everton (a)
|
L 1-0
|
56.45%
|
491
|
83.30%
|
Fulham (h)
|
W 2-0
|
64.39%
|
604
|
87.75%
|
Tottenham (a)
|
D 1-1
|
46.49%
|
343
|
74.64%
|
Norwich (a)
|
W 3-1
|
55.21%
|
506
|
86.36%
|
Cardiff (h)
|
W 4-1
|
64.91%
|
554
|
87.36%
|
Man City (h)
|
W 2-1
|
45.47%
|
396
|
83.84%
|
Newcastle (a)
|
L 2-0
|
60.95%
|
535
|
82.80%
|
West Brom (h)
|
D 2-2
|
67.83%
|
630
|
87.46%
|
West Ham (a)
|
W 3-0
|
55.06%
|
490
|
82.65%
|
Southampton (h)
|
W 3-1
|
50.96%
|
367
|
73.02%
|
The change in tactics unsettled Southampton and it was that switch that got Mourinho's men three goals, and three points.
What was surprising was that Chelsea's first two goals were from set-pieces.
In their previous 14 games in all competitions this
season, Southampton had only conceded two goals in that manner. Both
were against Sunderland - one
in the league
and one
in the Capital One Cup.
Title contenders?
If you are winning games, it does not matter who scores your goals.
But it just looks odd when your strikers are not
scoring. Ba did well when he came on and caused Saints lots of problems
but his late goal was his first of the season in the league.
It was down to Chelsea's defenders to get their team
out of trouble with the first two goals and, as I said on Football Focus
on Saturday, it looks strange that their forwards are struggling for
goals
when Romelu Lukaku is doing so well on loan at Everton.
Chelsea's strikers - and Romelu Lukaku - in the Premier League 2013-14
|
|
|
Lukaku
|
Ba
|
Torres
|
Eto'o
|
Source: Opta
|
Games
|
9
|
5
|
9
|
8
|
Mins on pitch
|
721
|
220
|
495
|
443
|
Goals
|
8
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Mins per goal
|
90
|
220
|
495
|
222
|
Shots on target
|
17
|
4
|
6
|
9
|
Shots off target
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
7
|
Shooting accuracy
|
81%
|
50%
|
55%
|
56%
|
Chance conversion
|
38%
|
13%
|
9%
|
13%
|
What can Mourinho do about it? Well, playing with
Torres and Ba together up front was effective against Southampton but
you would never say that Chelsea should do that on a regular basis.
Their usual system with three creative players behind a
striker in a 4-2-3-1 formation works and suits the flair players they
have got. What Mourinho doesn't have is one striker like Lukaku who is
scoring goals for him.
Still, he has the depth in his squad to change things
round when things are not going to plan, and his players battle for him
too - they have picked up eight points from losing positions this
season, more than any other top-flight team.
I would not say Chelsea are exciting to watch but they keep going and keep working hard.
The best teams with the best players have all got that
work ethic and under Mourinho they will always have it even when they
are not playing well.
Mourinho was rewarded for changing his formation and tactics against Southampton
Southampton are hard-working too - they have to be to
make their high-tempo pressing game work - but I am not sure they have
got the ability to adapt in the way Chelsea did against them on Sunday.
The best teams with the biggest squads can change things round during games.
Saints' system clearly works but even if the opposition
work them out, as Mourinho did, then they have to stick with it because
they do not have a back-up plan.
Southampton have lost twice in a week now,
to Arsenal
and now Chelsea, and those two away games have shown they are not quite up there with the really top teams in the table.
They got good results
at Anfield
and
Old Trafford
earlier in the season but they have to be playing at full-tilt for that to happen.
Southampton also do not score enough goals. They have
only managed 18 in their last 18 league games going back to April, and
only Sunderland have managed fewer than that. It is not good enough for
the top four.
For me, Chelsea will finish in the top three with Arsenal and Manchester City, although that could be in any order.
Everybody else is fighting for fourth, including
Manchester United, Liverpool Tottenham and Everton. Making the top eight
would be fantastic for Southampton, and I cannot see them finishing any
higher.